{"id":9998,"date":"2017-05-21T19:09:35","date_gmt":"2017-05-21T17:09:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/en\/?p=9998"},"modified":"2021-11-26T10:49:38","modified_gmt":"2021-11-26T09:49:38","slug":"is-the-right-for-freedom-of-assembly-intentionally-limited-by-the-ruling-parties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/is-the-right-for-freedom-of-assembly-intentionally-limited-by-the-ruling-parties\/","title":{"rendered":"Is the right for freedom of assembly intentionally limited by the ruling parties?!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div class=\"fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-1 nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling fusion-equal-height-columns\" style=\"--awb-background-position:left top;--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-padding-top:20px;--awb-padding-bottom:20px;--awb-border-sizes-top:0px;--awb-border-sizes-bottom:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;\" ><div class=\"fusion-builder-row fusion-row\"><div class=\"fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-0 fusion_builder_column_1_2 1_2 fusion-one-half fusion-column-first\" style=\"--awb-padding-top:5%;--awb-padding-right:5%;--awb-padding-bottom:5%;--awb-padding-left:5%;--awb-bg-color:#f4f4f4;--awb-bg-color-hover:#f4f4f4;--awb-bg-size:cover;width:48%; margin-right: 4%;\"><div class=\"fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy\"><div class=\"fusion-title title fusion-title-1 fusion-sep-none fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one\" style=\"--awb-margin-top-small:10px;--awb-margin-right-small:0px;--awb-margin-bottom-small:10px;--awb-margin-left-small:0px;\"><h1 class=\"fusion-title-heading title-heading-left\" style=\"margin:0;\"><h1 class=\"title\">Is the right for freedom of assembly intentionally limited by the ruling parties?!<\/h1><\/h1><\/div><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-1\"><div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>Some protestors who participated in the peaceful protest, on the 14<sup>th<\/sup> of May 2017, as well as investigative journalists, representatives of the civil society have reported attempts of intimidation and restriction of the right to join peaceful meetings.<\/p>\n<p>The State of RM, by <strong>art. 40<\/strong> from the <u>Constitution<\/u>, should <strong>guarantee<\/strong> the fundamental freedom for peaceful assembles, <em>\u201cincluding protests, demonstrations, manifestations or any other meetings should be free and guaranteed\u201d<\/em> <strong>without pressure or interference from the state entities<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>On the 14<sup>th<\/sup> of May, State Enterprise \u201cMoldova Railways\u201d has decided to cancel the movement of the trains on the whole territory of RM, for one day. Up to this moment, no objective information is available in regards to the deteriorated railways by the Sunday rains flows.\u00a0 Several people have declared that this decision has limited their right to movement and to take part in the protest.<\/p>\n<p>Several participants, who managed to take part in the Sunday protest, informed that the police patrol, stopped, questioned and fined the drivers who transported participants to this particular protest, in an abusive way.<\/p>\n<p>The information related to the necessity of assisting the rail transportation, the dislocation of a big number of patrolling police officers, has been presented by a number of media affiliated to some political leaders, and for this reason it cannot be considered accurate.<\/p>\n<p>We believe these actions are a substantial violation of the <strong>art. 4, part 1, \u00a7 a)<\/strong> of the <u>Law on Meetings<\/u> \u2013 the state has not secured the fulfillment of the principle of proportionality, according to which<em>, \u201cat the application of any kind of restriction of the freedom of meetings, the public authorities should respect the principle of balance between the necessity of such a restriction in a democratic society and the exercise of the right for assembly\u201d. <\/em><\/p>\n<p>Amnesty International Moldova welcomes the civic activism and expresses its concern related to the arbitrating decisions, which limit the rights of the citizens.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, we express our concern regarding the offensive and irresponsible speech of the President of RM, in a television broadcasting, accusing the NGO`s which have taken part in the protests against the Parliament\u2019s decision to include in its agenda two law projects, related to the modification of the electoral system, without these being consulted with the general public, civil society and the experts in the field, just as it is expressly stated by law.<\/p>\n<p>The President declared that he ordered one of his advisors to create a so-called <em>\u201d list of NGO\u2019s, their activities and finances\u201d<\/em>. The President has not clearly expressed on the scope of this list, and for which reasons it will be used.<\/p>\n<p>We request that the Government\u2019s and Parliament\u2019s representatives to present a clear and argued answer related to the necessity of ceasing the railway courses on the 14<sup>th<\/sup> of May, and the necessity of dislocating a significant number of patrolling policemen. Also, we request information from the President of RM in relation to the realization mode and the necessity of the list regarding finances and the activities of the NGO\u2019s, which have taken part in the protest, and the scope of the given list.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"http:\/\/amnesty.md\/en\/media\/dreptul-la-libera-intrunire-limitat-intentionat-la-vointa-partidelor-de-guvernare\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">amnesty.md<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><div class=\"fusion-clearfix\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-1 fusion_builder_column_1_2 1_2 fusion-one-half fusion-column-last\" style=\"--awb-padding-top:5%;--awb-padding-right:5%;--awb-padding-bottom:5%;--awb-padding-left:5%;--awb-bg-color:#f4f4f4;--awb-bg-color-hover:#f4f4f4;--awb-bg-size:cover;width:48%;\"><div class=\"fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy\"><div class=\"fusion-image-element in-legacy-container\" style=\"--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);\"><span class=\" fusion-imageframe imageframe-none imageframe-1 hover-type-none\"><a href=\"http:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Amnesty-680x378.jpg\" class=\"fusion-lightbox\" data-rel=\"iLightbox[9d7122a7eec8eef482b]\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Amnesty-680x378.jpg\" alt class=\"img-responsive\"\/><\/a><\/span><\/div><div class=\"fusion-sep-clear\"><\/div><div class=\"fusion-separator fusion-full-width-sep\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;margin-top:20px;width:100%;\"><\/div><div class=\"fusion-sep-clear\"><\/div><div class=\"fusion-video fusion-youtube\" style=\"--awb-max-width:515px;--awb-max-height:350px;\"><div class=\"video-shortcode\"><div class=\"fluid-width-video-wrapper\" style=\"padding-top:67.96%;\" ><iframe title=\"YouTube video player 1\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/xaT7d-64CsE?wmode=transparent&autoplay=0\" width=\"515\" height=\"350\" allowfullscreen allow=\"autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture;\"><\/iframe><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-clearfix\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-2 hundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling\" style=\"--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-overflow:visible;--awb-margin-top:30px;--awb-margin-bottom:30px;--awb-background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0);--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;\" ><div class=\"fusion-builder-row fusion-row\"><div class=\"fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-2 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-one-full fusion-column-first fusion-column-last fusion-column-no-min-height\" style=\"--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-margin-bottom:0px;\"><div class=\"fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy\"><div class=\"fusion-sep-clear\"><\/div><div class=\"fusion-separator fusion-full-width-sep\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;width:100%;\"><div class=\"fusion-separator-border sep-single sep-solid\" style=\"--awb-height:20px;--awb-amount:20px;--awb-sep-color:#f4f4f4;border-color:#f4f4f4;border-top-width:1px;\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-sep-clear\"><\/div><div class=\"fusion-clearfix\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":113,"featured_media":9996,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"slim_seo":{"title":"Is the right for freedom of assembly intentionally limited by the ruling parties?! - Menschenrechte Osteuropa - News &amp; Konflikte","description":"Is the right for freedom of assembly intentionally limited by the ruling parties?! Some protestors who participated in the peaceful protest, on the 14 th of May"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[218,236,112,216],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9998","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bl-en","category-moldawien-cat-en","category-moldova","category-standard"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9998","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/113"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9998"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9998\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30410,"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9998\/revisions\/30410"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9996"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/humanrights-online.org\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}